ADVAD / SAM NEWS

ADVAD / SAM INTRO

CATEGORIES

Cat10-A10: Author's Preference to Focus on Trinity

Postlude:

Category 6, 8 and 10: The Missing Categories


Category 6, 8, 10 were not included in this project as they are categories that the author left out for thematic reasons.

The original project had included a Category 6 category for worldly or secular philosophical constructions. The author decided that they had become outside of the constrictions of this project. (To see other statements as to authors view of this subject please read author’s letter and preface.)

Category 6 was left out because its construction became unneeded when the premise for the projects proved itself. Let us just call them worldly constructions that would attempt to portray a sinful liberality in an acceptable light.

The original project had also included a Category 8 for purely philosophical constructions. These were ideas that the human mind might construct that had some relational value from a Word stand point with the main project. As in Category 6 the idea was to develop ideas from a point of reference that might somehow prove support to the thesis of project. There is no need for them as the Bible stands on its own.

The same can be said for Category 6 and 8. Words and ideas are wonderful. But if they serve no real purpose for the Kingdom, then why needlessly entertain them. Only if the author surmises somehow a message of salvation could reach a lost soul. He thinks that the simple act of constructing the information in this project should be adequate to communicate the depth of the Christian life.

The Category 10 section was for tabulating results of any approach for understanding a dualism in constructions when comparing different large scale system organizations. Basically as a visual representation this would end up having an additional grid pattern from SAM superimposed over each systematic organization.

This idea could of course be a comparison with other named religions as an example or a large project using all categories in accumulation to compare resultants. This was not deemed necessary as the Truth in Action category is sufficient for comparison for denominational-church constructs.

It was decided that for Category 10 purposes: The existing basis as category constructions would suffice to make systematic comparisons.

Note: It is important to recognize that the author upon realizing the truth revealed in the written words of the Bible no longer needed to search or aspire to any other systematic research of another system of thought or religion.

Note: Once this truth was uncovered and much of this project became focused, it was senseless to compound the difficulty of the author’s effort and life work.